了解更多关于我们的专家团队、主要部门以及他们如何为广泛的工业市场提供解决方案。
凭借广泛的产品组合,我们拥有非常适合您应用需求的技术。
我们稳定可靠的气体分析解决方案可测量超过20种气体,可达到业界先进的精度和稳定性。
我们的专业知识和单一供应商解决方案有助于改善广泛的工业流程。
我们为危险和安全区域应用提供准确可靠的气体分析,包括超低检测和便携式产品。
为您的过程控制找到正确的气体分析解决方案。我们的探测器允许您通过关键参数进行选择,包括气体感测,使用的技术和所需的量程。
您是否想寻找有关已停产分析仪的详细信息?在这里你可以找到所有你需要的信息。
从单个带采样系统的分析仪到分析小屋,我们的专家团队可以提供可扩展的解决方案,以满足您的工艺需求。
我们提供定制的服务产品,以满足您精确的过程控制要求。
在保修期内报告产品故障,请填写这里的表格,以便及时回复。
获得您需要的高质量、授权的备件和消耗品,并快速交付。
我们的宣传册详细介绍了适合您的气体分析仪的备件资源。
Servomex致力于在整个组织中对人员和业务采取可持续的方法。
我们的全球业务建立在一套基本的价值观之上,这些价值观支撑着我们的工作、决策和文化。
成为Servomex团队的重要一员,与全球气体分析领域的领导者一起打造您的职业道路。
认识我们一些关键人员,并了解是什么让他们选择在Servomex工作。
如果你想要一份有意义的职业,与全球众多优秀的人才一起工作,请查看我们最新的招聘信息。
我们有适合各个层次的职业道路,从学徒和毕业生到经验丰富的领导角色
搜索我们全系列的杂志,视频,手册,白皮书,了解更多您需要的信息
按类别搜索,从我们广泛的产品和应用资源中获得更多信息。
了解Servomex和气体分析领域的最新信息,包括新产品发布和行业事件。
The advancing development of technology and digitalization in the gas analysis market offers significant benefits for end users, including reduced costs, less downtime, and greater efficiency.
However, the increased Industry 4.0 connectivity enabled by these improvements will create new challenges to security and consistency of operation that need to be expertly addressed.
When a component of a Safety Instrumented Function (SIF) has software-configurable elements related to the safety function, it’s important to ensure that the configuration is always correct.
For a gas analyzer, examples of these safety related software configurable elements include, the mA output Jam level to use under fault conditions, the measurement range assigned to the mA output, the measurement path length, and the routing configuration to apply a mA input providing pressure measurement into a gas measurement compensation function contributing to accurate measurement.
Field instrumentation has, traditionally, not focused on security. A small number of role-based access levels may afford some protection: for example, Viewer, Operator, and Supervisor access levels, each protected by a basic password/code.
While a Supervisor level login may somewhat limit changes to the configuration of a safety function, any individual who knows the Supervisor password has that access. Role-based access means there is no record of who, at an individual level, logged in – it was just someone acting as a Supervisor. Often there are no logs to track the time, date and detail of a configuration change.
Use of a Supervisor level of access can become commonplace because it unlocks everything and means passwords are seen not to ‘get in the way’. A side-effect of this can be the increased risk of an unintentional change to the safety configuration. This can, in turn, either allow dangerous conditions to go undiagnosed, or cause unintentional process shutdown, both of which result in unnecessary costs.
The use of minimal security is a historical hangover related to several factors: this type of equipment having little connectivity, industrial cybersecurity not traditionally being a significant concern, and the use of highly resource-constrained microcontrollers and memory components, which limited device capability.
However, times have changed. Connectivity has rapidly increased, bringing considerable benefits but also increased risk. Industrial cybersecurity has become a significant concern, with external threats, supply chain threats and, unfortunately, also industrial insider threats. Resource constraints are largely a thing of the past with high-performance microcontrollers and high capacity memory readily available at low cost.
Instrumentation, including gas analysis equipment, must now carefully consider both security and safety. Without adequate security, safety cannot be adequately assured. Although, it is also worth noting that security controls can also hinder safety, so both must be considered jointly.
For now, in terms of change management, increased availability of Ethernet at the field device level, particularly with the advent of Advanced Physical Layer (APL) Ethernet, allows field instruments to more easily tap into existing Enterprise Identity-based access management systems.
Instrument access permissions could be assigned to individuals. Consistent identity-based access will better restrict access to instrumentation configuration and enable traceability at an individual level.
Human-machine interface (HMI) design aims to minimize operator error at high-stress moments. This could be improved to minimize inadvertent safety configuration changes by requiring a second re-authentication, in the same way that online banking requires re-authentication before transferring funds.
A further layer of protection could be added using dual-identity authentication, requiring any two sufficiently privileged individuals to log in, to confirm a change to safety-related configuration.
So, while digitalization does raise change management security concerns, it’s clear that these issues can be effectively addressed and could lead to more resilient, safer systems that offer greater performance benefits. A future blog will delve deeper into other aspects of security and trustworthiness of analytical instrumentation.
您已添加到我们的新闻通讯中